Friday, January 24, 2014

The Dirty Rouge Podcast Episode 10: Biscuits and Gravy

Hey kids!

In this episode, the Boys are reunited and it feels so good! This week; Jeremy intros a new intro, James has a bone to pick, and Ricky gives thanks to the yoga gods by daring to ask the immortal question, "Boobs or Ass?". It's a fun time folks so kick on back and ENJOY!

Episode 10: Biscuits and Gravy 

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

The Dirty Rouge Podcast Episode 9: Flying Under The Gaydar

Hey kids!

In this episode, we bring in a pinch hitter as Chandler joins Jeremy and Ricky on the Porch! This week; Ricky defends his "Blackness", Jeremy writes a movie, and Chandler geeks out over the delectable decadence of debauchery that is The Wolf of Wall Street!  It's a fun time folks, so kick on back and ENJOY!

Episode 9: Flying Under The Gaydar 

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Rouge Review: The Wolf of Wall Street


Money is the oxygen of capitalism and I wanna breathe more than any other human being alive.
 - Jordan Belfort 

Hey kids! 

If you've read my past reviews  you know I tend to get somewhat weepy at the movies. I can't help it, I'm a softy at heart.  However,  the teary eyed reaction  is not the only one that ensures that a movie did it's job in my eyes. To me, if a movie isn't trying to illicit an emotional reaction  from me, if the film's sole purpose is to  highlight the most despicable of individuals and show their day to day life, that story better be out of this world intriguing and interesting. So, when in the first 5 minutes of this film the audience sees Leonardo Dicaprio snorting cocaine into a hooker's ass, needless to say I was locked in for the long haul. And a long haul it is because this flick, a masterwork by the equally masterful Martin Scorsese, is a three hour long exercise in grotesque excess and debauchery, a world  where money is the reason for living and all rules apply only to idiotic normal people with misguided moral barometers. "THE WOLF OF WALL STREET" is a no holds barred sprint that is unrelenting. By the time I walked out of the theater I felt as though I'd just jumped off a three hour long roller coaster. I couldn't quite believe what I had just seen but I knew that it was one hell of a movie. 



Martin Scorsese is no stranger  to the world of devious individuals. "Goodfellas" is a classic in every sense of the word, as well as "Taxi Driver", "Gangs of New York" and the Oscar winning "The Departed". If anyone knows  how to show criminal behavior, it's him. In this movie he tackles an interesting wrinkle of the criminal society, the crooks and swindlers of Wall Street who utilize the gullibility of their "Get Rich Quick" clients to turn a buck on their misfortune. In the past few years this has been a hot button topic, after the Recession of 2008 people aren't quite as willing to trust those fine folks in New York with their money. And after seeing  this movie, I don't blame them. 

The story follows the true story of a man named Jordan Belfort who at the age of 22 set his sights on Wall Street and by the time he was 26 made 49 millions dollars in one year. Not to shabby. The part is played with delicious malevolence by Leonardo Dicaprio, who disappears into the role and is the conduit for the audience to see this world of unimaginable debauchery through the eyes of the one who lived through it. The film is not about the ins and outs of Wall Street, nor is it really a crime drama, it's essentially about how through a few years in the 90's this company made it their mission to live to such unbelievable levels  of excess that  there was no mountain to great. The film begins with Jordan and his associates throwing a midget against a target and a shot of Jordan in his Ferrari getting a blow job from his Miller Lite Girl wife Naomi. This is within the first 5 minutes of the film! There was a woman sitting behind me in the theater who brought  a 6 year old  kid to watch the movie. A 6 year old! I don't know if I envy that kid or not because he got himself a good old fashioned tutorial on everything  from the proper methodology for snorting coke to the dangers of fucking a dime priced hooker. 

Many people,  in the media as well as in the film industry, have cited this  movie for it's glorification of criminality. In their eyes, Scorsese  is showing how awesome it is to be rich and to not give a fuck about the people you hurt in the process. Now, these people are completely idiotic and here's why. Scorsese didn't make this story up; it's a real, factually based account written into a book by Jordan Belfort himself. It's not like Scorsese, or any writer for that matter, just sat around one day and envisioned this world where a Stock Brokerage Owner hires 50 hookers for a bachelor party on a private jet. You know why no one comes up with that kind've story? Because no one would ever buy that idea. It's so insanely off the walls ludicrous that audiences would call BULLSHIT the second they walked out've the theater! Instead what Scorsese is showing is, "Look at what these idiots got away with. Isn't it fucked up?" Because it is folks, no denying. I sat through all three hours of that movie and while on the surface I was intrigued as to the hows of what went on, I knew that this was a molotov cocktail that would eventually erupt in the face of Jordan and his cohorts, which it did and should. Karma is a bitch that strikes everybody, but not necessarily in the way one imagines. 


Another major gripe  that people seem to have is that Jordan is never shown to be punished for his  actions. !!SPOILERS!! By the end of the movie, he's made a plea deal, sending his friends to jail, spends 3 years behind bars himself, and then spent the next decade or so as a very successful motivational speaker, showing  the ins and outs of selling crap for millions. Again, it's not like Scorsese made up a character that experienced  no consequences, it's  what really happened! The fact that this  guy was able to get away with as much as he did and barely suffer any consequences is the true story; the injustice of that in reality is much more horrifying than the fact that he got off in the end. God I hate critics. 

Besides that the film is filled to the brim with brilliant performances, all held together by Dicaprio who is  in almost every single frame of the film. Giving  an equally transcendent appearance is the one and only Mr. Jonah Hill! Jonah goes for broke as the crack smoking, cousin fucking, quaaludes popping second in command to Dicaprio's Belfort. With fake teeth and  sunglasses, he gives a performance that stands toe to  toe with anyone else in the film, proving  once and for all that Jonah Hill is easily one of the best actors working today. Who woulda  thunk it right? 

Needless to say, this is most certainly not a flick to see with your parents; okay, maybe your Dad but not your Mom. I couldn't watch "The Hangover" with my Mother and that was just for the jokes. Unless you can imagine sitting beside the woman who raised you watching Leo Dicaprio doing  blow off  his wife's  boobs, steer clear. But for you, the viewer, "THE WOLF  OF  WALL STREET" is a trip through an adult's fantasy world that really existed. It dives headlong into the most carnal desires that we all have. What would we do if we had enough money to throw away? In a film filled with cocaine and prescription drug abuse on the reg,  the most irresistible drug of all is money and wealth and power and control. It's the very thing that drives Jordan, that constant  need to  consume and purchase. It's the American Dream slapping us in the face, the ultimate vision of capitalism brought to life, complete with hookers, midgets, and lots of blow. 

My recommendation: SEE IT! (Parental Discretion Advised - Meaning Do Not Bring Your Mother!)

Until next time, thanks for reading! 

Jeremy 

The Dirty Rogue Podcast Episode 8: 100 Virgins and a Beamer

Hey kids!

In this episode; ALL the kids came out to play as James, Ricky, and Jeremy babble their silly little heads off for the first time in 2014. This week; Ricky and Jeremy battle it out to see who's the most "mature", James is the boy who cried "Conspiracy Theory", and the Boys question the ins and outs of defining one's sexual orientation. It's a fun time folks so kick on back and ENJOY!

Episode 8: 100 Virgins and a Beamer 

Thursday, January 2, 2014

Rouge Review: Saving Mr. Banks




“Winds in the east, mist coming in. Like something is brewing, about to begin.” – Bert

Hey kids!      
                What makes us who we are? Is it the world we inhabit,  or the people who surround us, who love us that shape who we become as we grow older. It’s the old argument of Nature vs. Nurture. I tend to agree with the Nurture side of the equation. There are very few things in my life which I cannot in some way, shape, or form correlate to something from my past; whether it be as simple as having sword fights with my Dad or the fact that I spent most of my early teenage years with my nose in a book. These are the things that shape us into who we are, and who we become. But we are not defined by those early influences.

                That’s my long, drawn out introduction for my review of “SAVING MR. BANKS”; which in the most basic of terms chronicles the hard-nosed effort of Walt Disney to secure the rights to the character of Mary Poppins from the author P.L. Travers, specifically two weeks where she ventured from  London to Los Angeles  to give her insight into what she believed the film should be, a film that in her eyes  would not include a single song and most certainly none of Disney’s “silly cartoons”. That is the surface story, the one used to sell the idea  to  audiences and most likely the financiers of the film itself. But, the deeper story, the one harder to sell in a trailer, is the one most fascinating and is the reason that this struck as deep a chord with me as it did. Perhaps it was because I hold Disney history in such high regard, perhaps it was because I saw the film on New Years Eve, or it even might be because I’m just a soft hearted bastard that romanticizes everything, but for whatever reason you prefer “SAVING MR. BANKS” is my favorite movie of the year.


                I’ve known about this project for years now; from the very day that it was announced that Tom Hanks was to play Walt Disney. I was over the moon excited. Walt Disney and everything he encompasses and represents holds a very dear place in my heart. The worlds of fantasy created within his lifetime are so integral to my childhood that it’s almost impossible to separate my own experiences without some facet of that brilliant imagination coming into play. I’ve read every book I could on the man, multiple biographies, which when I say it out loud sounds border line ridiculous. But the life of this farm boy from Missouri captured my imagination in ways I can’t even still quite comprehend. I grew up within his worlds of wonderment; Walt Disney World was in many ways my home. It was the place that I came to live, to be free and happy before being shuffled back to reality, where expectations and bullies awaited.  And it all stemmed from this one man, a man who died almost 30 years before I was even born, a man I would never meet but am incredibly indebted to. So the idea of seeing Walt Disney portrayed on screen for the first time, by Tom Hanks no less, was enough to send this Disney Geek’s heart soaring. But, while this was my initial reason for falling in love with the concept of the film, the actual story is far more fascinating indeed. You see the story is not about Walt, not directly anyway. Instead it’s about a little girl and her love for her father.



                While the film highlights the creative process that went into the creation of a modern film masterpiece, “MARY POPPINS”, it is the story of Mrs. P.L. Travers which makes the story of the story all the more compelling. Mrs. Travers was not born such, her real name was Helen Goff, the daughter of a banker in turn of the century Australia. Her father, Travers Goff, was an incredibly loving man, prone to wild bouts of imagination with which he would transport his daughter to a world of princesses and dragons. The film shows the tender interactions between Travers and Helen, their fantasies roaming freely as they become whoever or whatever they wish to be, far away from the choke hold world of money and jobs within they both lived. You see, Travers Goff was fired from bank after bank because he was a drunk. He would take off entire days from work just to play with his daughters, only for his wife to find a half empty bottle of booze in his jacket pocket. So Helen would watch while her father’s whimsy became his downfall, and her family was decimated because of his inability to accept the role that reality had dealt him. He is Mr. Banks. He is the man Mary Poppins comes to save. 

                While every performance in this film is pitch perfect, he unsung hero of this film is the transcendent performance that Colin Farrell gives as Travers Goff.  He is the epitome of what every child wishes their father to be, tender and understand, whimsical and able to spring into a world of fantasy at the drop of a hat. Farrell brings to this performance a tenderness that immediately made me think of every time my Father played make pretend with me, when we were pirates in the Spanish Maine or I was Batman fighting the Joker. The love in the eyes of Travers Goff is the love I’d seen a thousand times throughout my childhood, the love that I’m sure most everybody could associate with their own memories in some form or another. We all have that one person who inspired us in some way to dream as children that helped us battle off the banality of reality away for just a little while. Colin Farrell truly should be the awards favorite from this film, and that’s saying something let me tell you. But unfortunately he is overshadowed by the two heavy hitter characters of Disney and Travers, leaving his performance somewhat in the dust. But to be honest, coming from the biggest Disney Geek on Earth and while I loved Tom Hanks as Walt, it’s Travers Goff who had me weeping throughout the film.

         This is a film about fathers, simple as that, and the reverberations that the actions of our fathers have on us throughout our lives. Mrs. Travers watched her father’s imagination tear her family apart, so she substituted that whimsy with the prickliest of demeanors. Emma Thompson performs at the top of her game as the tight lipped British writer, battling her own demons throughout the flick. To see her statuesque façade melt throughout the course of the film was a wonder to behold. But the most fascinating idea of the film is how the actions of our parents have a direct correlation to who we become. Mrs. Travers’ father was a man of wild bouts of imagination and whimsy, but that life drove her family to ruin. This traumatizing childhood unfortunately had vast reverberations throughout the rest of Mrs. Travers life. She grew to be cold and calculating, removing herself from anything and everything whimsical or childlike. It’s for this reason that she turns her nose up at Walt’s vast empire of imagination; she has grown icy to such things.

 And even Walt Disney himself, a beacon of fantasy and imagination who’s influence is still felt to this day, almost 50 years after his death, has a story that sheds light onto the man he would ultimately become, a story wrought from his earliest days  of childhood when his Father would force Walt to deliver 500 newspapers twice daily; through rain, sleet, or snow. Walt is a man born from the hard backed, ruggedness of Americana, a byproduct of his father’s own American dream. And in turn, Walt faced that reality and countered it with fantasy, with the transference of real world themes told through fantastical worlds of animation and wonderment he was able to transcend harsh realities and instead bring light to the darkness.

                I know, you could say I’m rambling but honestly my feelings on this film could be enough to fill an entire essay or book for that matter. The poetic correlation between Father and Child in this film hit me in a very deep, personal place. There wasn’t a point in the film where I wasn’t either smiling or crying, but more often than not I was doing both at the same time. Anyone who ever grew up watching “MARY POPPINS” or grew up singing “Let’s Go Fly A Kite” will leave the theater with an incredibly bright warmth in your chest; a feeling of pleasant nostalgia for that small bit of us that still believes there is magic in the world. There were a million things in this film for me to geek out over, (I basically yipped with delight when I saw plans for Disney World sitting in Walt’s office. Judge me if you will.) but that’s not the reason this film is my favorite of the year, if not one of my favorite films of all time. It was an incredibly personal, spiritual experience that hit both the inner child and the “adult” I am now. I really don’t know what more to say, my mind on the matter is still a jumble of emotions and opinions. Part of me wants to write more about the film itself but at this point it doesn’t really matter. This movie hit me in a way I’ve never felt before and while this year has been a roller coaster of mega ups and abysmal downs, the clock ticked off on 2013 with me feeling incredibly supercalifragilisticexpialidocious. What more could I ever ask for in a silly little movie?

My Recommendation: SEE IT! 

Until next time, thanks for reading!
Jeremy